The wide range in the rates of sweet-smelling intensifies that might be available in every fixation implies that the wording of extra, EdP, EdT, and EDC is very loose. In spite of the fact that an EDP will frequently be more thought than an EDT and thus an EDC, this is not generally the situation. Diverse perfumeries or aroma houses allocate distinctive measures of oils to each of their scents. Along these lines, despite the fact that the oil convergence of a scent in EdP weakening will essentially be higher than a similar aroma in EDT from inside an organization's same range, the genuine sums fluctuate among fragrance houses. An EdT from one house may have a higher convergence of sweet-smelling mixes than an EdP from another.

Moreover, a few scents with a similar item name yet having an alternate focus may vary in their weakenings, as well as really utilize distinctive aroma oil blends inside and out. For example, keeping in mind the end goal to make the EDT variant of a scent brighter and fresher than its EdP, the EDT oil might be "changed" to contain marginally more top notes or fewer base notes. Chanel No. 5 is a decent case: its perfume, EdP, EdT, and now-ceased EdC fixations are in actuality diverse structures (the perfume dates to 1921, while the EdP was not created until the 1980s). Now and again, words, for example, extrême, extraordinary, or concentrée that may demonstrate a higher sweet-smelling focus are entirely unique aromas, related simply because of a comparative scent accord. A case of this is Chanel's Pour Monsieur and Pour Monsieur Concentrée.

As a general guideline, ladies' scents have a tendency to have more elevated amounts of sweet-smelling mixes than men's aromas. Aromas promoted to men are commonly sold as EDT or EDC, once in a while as EdP or scent removes. Ladies' scents used to be regular at all levels of focus, however, today are for the most part observed in perfume, EdP and EdT fixations.